2014 Poster Presentations

2014 Poster Presentations

Posters

Note: Not all poster presentations were submitted in digital format. Those that were are listed below. Click on the abstract name to view the poster.

Poster

Number

 Abstract

Number

 Abstract

Name
P-01 2965 Changing hepatocellular carcinoma incidence and liver cancer mortality rates in the United States
P-02 2982 A New Model for Annual Incidence Cancer Reporting
P-04 2988 Quality of Cancer Care: The Role of the Urological Cancer Registry
P-05 2989 A comparison of methods for assessing completeness of case ascertainment in data from the National Program of Cancer Registries
P-06 2995 Referral and Treatment Patterns for Rectal Cancer Patients in New Brunswick
P-07 2996 The first New Brunswick Cancer System Performance Indicators report -A collaborative effort
P-08 3006 Tumor Linkage Exact Match Automation Rule
P-09 3007 Smoothed Lexis Diagrams: with Applications to Lung and Breast Cancer Trends in Taiwan
P-10 3011 Oregon’s Approach to Increasing Awareness of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (HBOC) among Clinicians and Patients
P-11 3014 Cancer incidence in adolescents and young adults (AYA) in Massachusetts, 2006-2010
P-12 3016 Access to Care in Vermont: Factors Linked with Time to Chemotherapy for Women with Breast Cancer
P-13 3019 TRENDS OF BREAST AND CERVICAL CANCERS IN ALGIERS
P-14 3022 Using the NAACCR Geocoder to Perform In-House Geocoding of Your Registry Database
P-17 3033 The Epidemiology of Primary Brain Tumors among Massachusetts Residents, 2001-2010
P-18 3037 Improving Completeness of Benign Brain Tumor Reporting by a Linkage with Hospital Inpatient Discharge Data – Louisiana Tumor Registry’s Experiences
P-19 3044 Patient characteristics and registry variation associated with receipt of KRAS testing in colorectal cancer
P-20 3045 An Audit of Gender Codes for Gender Specific Cancers – California’s Results
P-21 3047 Edit Errors on File Upload: Use of Report Analysis to Improve Data Quality
P-23 3055 Processing Corrections/Updates in California: How do we get the most important information in the most efficient way possible?
P-24 3060 A Missouri Model for Batch Audit Quality Assessment
P-25 3061 Use of Live Meeting to Conduct Interactive Quality Review of Data from a Multi-campus Healthcare System
P-26 3062 Cancer Disparities in Alaska Native People
P-29 3071 Evaluation of Lexis Nexis Batch Solutions for Cancer Registries in New York State
P-30 3085 Cancer screening among Manitoba’s First Nations population
P-31 3087 A Critical Review of the Data Quality Report for the Canadian Cancer Registry
P-32 3089 “I KNOW YOU OWE ME!”: RECOVERING STAGE INFORMATION FROM UROLOGISTS IN PUERTO RICO
P-33 3096 A Comparative Analysis of Cancer Rates for Indiana’s 10 Public Health Districts
P-34 3100 ENHANCING RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT DATA AMONG PROSTATE CANCER CASES DIAGNOSED FROM 2008 TO 2011 IN PUERTO RICO
P-35 3105 Epidemiological Trends of HPV-related Cancers in Minnesota
P-36 3109 Cancer staging and treatment for First Nations in Manitoba
P-37 3114 Trends in initial management of prostate cancer in New Hampshire – Reasons for optimism?

Funding for this web site content was made possible in part by a contract with Federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health and Department of Health & Human Services under Contract number 75N91021D00018 / 75N91021F00001. Additionally, funding for this web site content was made possible in part by a cooperative agreement with Federal funds from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cooperative Agreement number 1NU58DP007575. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NCI and CDC.

Copyright © 2018 NAACCR, Inc. All Rights Reserved | naaccr-swoosh-only See NAACCR Partners and Sponsors