TUESDAY, JUNE 5  CONFERENCE DAY 1

Plenary Session #2
PAVILION BALLROOM

Concurrent Session #1

1:30 pm – 3:00 pm

Section A:

GEOCODING METHODS
GALLERIA I

Moderator: D O’Brien

02 Accuracy and Precision of the NAACCR Geocoder
R L Sherman, University of Miami

04 Strategies for Increasing Geocoding Accuracy
D Rust, Kentucky Cancer Registry

Section B:

INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO COLLECTING TREATMENT DATA
GALLERIA II

Moderator: F Ross

05 Toward Achieving More Complete Treatment Information – What Can Be Obtained From Resubmitted Hospital Data?
A Kahn, New York State Cancer Registry

06 Cancer Reporting from Radiation Treatment Centers
A R Houser, C/NET Solutions, PHI

08 Validation of SEER Treatment Data Using Medicare Claims
A M Noone, NCI

Section D:

DATA USE AND RESEARCH
BROADWAY I AND II

Moderator: M Williams

13 Unstaged Cancer in the United States: A Population-Based Look at Demographic, Socioeconomic, and Geographic Variables as Predictors of Staging
K Herget, University of Utah

14 Linking the 1991 Census to the Canadian Cancer Registry to Advance Knowledge About Cancer in First Nations and Metis Adults in Canada
D Withrow, Cancer Care Ontario

15 A Novel Method for Multiple Mediation Analysis – With Application to Analyze Racial Disparity in Breast Cancer Mortality
Q Yu, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center

Section E:

DATA COLLECTION AND RESEARCH
BROADWAY III AND IV

Moderator: A Stewart

17 Enhancing Cancer Registries for Comparative Effectiveness Research: Development of an Infrastructure for Data Collection
C R Eheman, Cancer Surveillance Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, CDC

19 Treatment Summaries for All! An Expanded Role for Central Cancer Registries
R K Rycroft, Colorado Central Cancer Registry

20 Developing a Tracking System to Ensure Completeness of CER Required Data Items
D Rousseau, Hospital Association of Rhode Island

Concurrent Session #2

3:30 pm – 5:00 pm

Section A:

IMPROVING DATA QUALITY THROUGH ELECTRONIC METHODS
GALLERIA I

Moderator: F Michaud

21 Analysis of Time and Effort Required to Collect Data for 2004 Collaborative Stage Site-Specific Factors
H M Kim, Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health

24 Enhancing Data Quality Through Automation
C Moody, California Cancer Registry/Public Health Institute

Section B:

CANCER SURVIVAL ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
GALLERIA II

Moderator: N Lozon

25 Where Wisconsin Cancer Patients Die: Observations and Practical Implications
R L Borchers, Wisconsin Cancer Reporting System

27 How Can We Make Cancer Survival Statistics More Useful for Patients and Clinicians – An Application Using Localized Prostate Cancer in Sweden
S Eloranta, Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet

28 Evaluating NAACCR Survival Data for Fitness for Use
H Weir, CDC

Section C:

GEOGRAPHIC AND SPATIAL RESEARCH
GALLERIA III

Moderator: R Sherman

29 Overcoming Small Numbers in a Small State: Vermont’s Approach to Cancer Mapping
J Kachajian, Vermont Department of Health

30 Comparing Spatial Patterns Using Hierarchical Bayes Models
L Zhu, NCI/SEER

31 Geographic Variation in Thyroid Cancer Incidence in Ontario, Canada: 2003-2007
E Candido, Cancer Care Ontario

32 Geocoding Reference Data Quality Assessment Strategies at North Carolina CCR
C Klaus, NC Central Cancer Registry

Section D:

USING CANCER SURVEILLANCE DATA FOR PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY
BROADWAY I AND II

Moderator: L Coleman

33 Supporting Public Health Unit Analyses of Cancer Registry Data
B Theis, Cancer Care Ontario

35 Making the Case for Chronic Disease Prevention Policies Using Ontario Cancer Registry Data
B Theis, Cancer Care Ontario

Section E:

INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO DATA COLLECTION
BROADWAY III AND IV

Moderator: L O’Connor

36 Consolidating Health Providers’ Data into a Relational Database System for the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry
L Carrasco, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

37 Using Mixture Cure Models to Estimate Biological Cure
M Stedman, NCI

39 Using Cancer Surveillance Data to Advance Science: Monitoring for a Potential Safety Signal for Approved Drugs through Linkage Studies
D Harris, RTI Health Solutions

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 6CONFERENCE DAY 2

Concurrent Session #3

10:45 am – 12:15 pm

Section A:

DATA QUALITY: CANCER STAGING
GALLERIA I

Moderator: K Ward

40 Comparison of Directly Coded Summary Stage 2000 and Derived Summary Stage 2000 Using Data from NPCR for Breast and Colon Cancer Cases
R Wilson, CDC

42 The 2011 Collaborative Stage Reliability Study Results for Cancers of Lung, Breast, Colon and Prostate
J Ruhl, NCI/SEER

Section B:

AUTOMATING DATA COLLECTION PROCESSES
GALLERIA II

Moderator: S Vann

44 Getting the Most Out of Web Plus File Upload and Download Features in Tennessee
R Tenney, Tennessee Cancer Registry

45 It’s About Time . . . for ICD-10-CM Implementation
L Inferrera, California Cancer Registry

46 Bridging the Discharge Data Gap: National Harmonization and Education Efforts
S Jones, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

47 Automated Tumor Consolidation: The Florida Algorithm
G Levin, Florida Cancer Data System

Section D:

ANALYTIC EPIDEMIOLOGY II
BROADWAY I AND II

Moderator: B Theis

52 The Real Cancer Problem in Hinkley
J W Morgan, Loma Linda University School of Public Health

53 The Mystery of Ontario’s Unusually High Pancreatic Cancer Survival
D Nishri, Cancer Care Ontario

55 Cancer Clusters in the US – What Do the Last Twenty Years of State and Federal Investigations Tell Us?
M Goodman, Emory University, School of Public Health

Section E:

EDUCATION AND TRAINING
BROADWAY III AND IV

Moderator: M Dryden

56 Building Bridges with Hospital Registries: Louisiana Experience
V W Chen, Louisiana Tumor Registry

57 Educational Outreach – A Glimpse into FCDS Current and Future Education Plans
S Peace, Florida Cancer Data System

THURSDAY, JUNE 7CONFERENCE DAY 3

Plenary Session #4
PAVILION BALLROOM

Concurrent Session #4

10:15 am – 11:45 am

Section B:

ASSESSING COLLABORATIVE STAGE
GALLERIA II

Moderator: M Adamo

64 Assessing Completeness of CSv2 Site Specific Factor Data Items in Louisiana
V W Chen, Louisiana Tumor Registry

66 Evaluating Unknown Stage by Collaborative Staging Components and Surgery Status for Colon Cancer – NAACCR Data Assessment Workgroup
M C Hsieh, Louisiana Tumor Registry

Section C:

TRENDS IN CANCER INCIDENCE AND MORTALITY
GALLERIA III

Moderator: D Nishri

68 Cancers with Increasing Incidence Trends in the United States: 1999 – 2008
E Simard, American Cancer Society

70 The Effect of Changing Hysterectomy Prevalence on Trends in Endometrial Cancer, SEER 1992-2008
A M Noone, NCI

Section D:

ANALYTIC EPIDEMIOLOGY III
BROADWAY I AND II

Moderator: L Biazzo

72 Sociodemographic Factors Predicting Non-Receipt of Guideline-Concordant Chemotherapy Among Locoregional Breast Cancer Women Under Age 70 Years
X C Wu, Louisiana Tumor Registry/School of Public Health, LSU Health Sciences Center

74 Demographic Predictors of Delayed Stage Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis in California, 2004-2008
J W Morgan, Loma Linda University School of Public Health

Section E:

DATA INTEGRATION AND UTILIZATION
BROADWAY III AND IV

Moderator: N Lozon

76 The Death Clearance Process: What Do We Gain From Our Efforts?
M J Schymura, New York State Cancer Registry

78 Using Text Fields to Determine Out of State Diagnoses in Central Cancer Registries
L Soloway, New York State Cancer Registry

79 The Saskatchewan Cancer Registry: Uses, Opportunities and Challenges
G Narasimhan, Epidemiology Department, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency

Concurrent Session #5

2:00 pm – 3:30 pm

Section A:

INITIATIVES IN INFORMATICS
GALLERIA I

Moderator: M Green

81 Standardizing Cancer Pathology Reporting: Promoting Interoperability Through Collaboration
A Kwiatowski, Canadian Partnership Against Cancer

Section B:

CAPTURING INFORMATION FROM ELECTRONIC REPORTING SOURCES
GALLERIA II

Moderator: M J King

84 Capturing EMR Data for Cancer Care Research and Validation of Registry Data: A Florida Case Study
M Hernandez, Florida Cancer Data System, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine

85 A New Approach: Using Electronic Health Records to Capture Unreported Cases and Missing Data
J Jackson-Thompson, University of Missouri

86 XML – How it Impacts NAACCR
R Pinder, USC School of Medicine

Section C:

ANALYTIC EPIDEMIOLOGY IV
GALLERIA III

Moderator: E Candido

90 Using the Standard Incidence Ratio (SIR) to Investigate a Potential Link between Cancer Incidence and a Chemical Spill in North Pole, Alaska
D K O’Brien, Alaska Cancer Registry

91 Cancer Among Hispanics in New Mexico, 1981-2008
A Meisner, New Mexico Tumor Registry, University of New Mexico

Section D:

USING DATA FOR CANCER PREVENTION AND CONTROL
BROADWAY I AND II

Moderator: R Rycroft

92 Innovative Uses of Cancer Registry Data: Estimating the Number Of Young Breast Cancer Patients at Risk Of Infertility Due to Cancer Treatments
A K Fink, ICF International

95 The New Unified Cancer Registration Service for England
A Murphy, Cambridge University Hospital

Section E:

RESULTS OF OUR EFFORTS
BROADWAY III AND IV

Moderator: R Otto

96 Comparative Analysis of Stage and Other Prognostic Factors among Urethral, Ureteral, and Renal Pelvis Malignant Tumors
S Negoita, Westat

99 A New Approach for Accurately Projecting the Future Burden of Cancer
L Mery (On Behalf of M C Otterstatter), Public Health Agency of Canada